Slawomir Mrozeks The Elephant Essay Example For Students

Slawomir Mrozeks The Elephant Essay When things are not thought thoroughly, situations can get more complicated than it needs to be. These personal intensions are not always intended. But even today, strong feelings and personal bias influence can cause a little mistake and lead to a larger problem. Slawomir Mrozeks The Elephant clearly shows the directors selfishness in his decisions and in return, he has crushed the lives of a pack of schoolchildren. Same thing goes for Reginald C. Bretnors Bug-getter. It demonstrated how one word can lead to a huge misunderstanding taken many lives. Both stories had the idea of a protagonist making/helping the world become a better place in their own ways and their actions or so they think. In Slawomir Mrozeks The Elephant, the director of the Zoological Gardens sees the animals of his zoo as stepping stones on the road of his own career. He is careless about the educational value of his own zoo. Since the Zoo was in a provincial town, the zoo wasnt funded and therefore was lacking some of the most important animals, basically with what animals they had were all a surplus. Three thousand rabbits tried replacing a bigger animal like an elephant although many schoolchildren visit every day to learn about the animals. A good note was with the arrival of the zoos anniversary, they were going to receive an elephant! All the staff rejoiced at this news but instead of rejoicing the director was thinking of his own career and decided to refuse the governments offer. He wrote a letter to the government reusing the offer and explaining his more economical plan on saving the government a lot of money. Upon hearing the Ministrys approval the zoo made a rubber elephant. Ordering 2 men to do the job over night, after a few hours blowing straight air into the elephant, they were tired and thought it was odd to be blowing up an elephant as their job. It was all because their director is a leftist that the two men decided to blow up the elephant with gas after finding them tired and running out of air and lacking motivation. That morning, when the elephant was placed in front of a large real rock in the middle of the zoo, the first visitors was a pack of schoolchildren. The teacher who was in charge wanted to give a lesson about the elephant. As the children looked at the elephant with great enraptured admiration they learnt more and more about elephants. After a sudden breeze, the elephant shuddered and rose in the air. This clearly showed that the there is no real elephant. As a result, the public gets hurt. It is completely a waste of peoples money and time. The zoo staff thought that they could fool the public by replicating the real thing but in re ality they were only making a fool out of themselves. Not only that but for those schoolchildren who had witnessed the scene in the Zoo started neglecting their studies and turned into hooligans. They didnt believe anything they were told and basically their lives turned upside down and no longer saw the bigger picture in life. In Reginald C. Bretnors Bug-getter, an artist, Ambrosius Goshawk had hired an exterminator because his apartment was full of little green crickets. The exterminator who asked for 18 paintings as his fee, six in advance then after the extermination, another dozen more, had returned two years later. At that time, Goshawk was wealthy and was successful with his artistry career. The exterminator had come to take his last twelve paintings. Refusing to give the exterminator anymore more paintings, Goshawk rudely told him that there were as many of these damned crickets as ever! Being shocked the exterminator had thought that Goshawk had said critics not crickets! So, for two years, the exterminator had being killing critics instead of crickets. In this case, Goshawk thought the exterminator was fake and didnt do anything at all. Obviously it wasnt worth his money because the job was never done. .ub95c893e1ed5b3ede3d8d8539235de16 , .ub95c893e1ed5b3ede3d8d8539235de16 .postImageUrl , .ub95c893e1ed5b3ede3d8d8539235de16 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ub95c893e1ed5b3ede3d8d8539235de16 , .ub95c893e1ed5b3ede3d8d8539235de16:hover , .ub95c893e1ed5b3ede3d8d8539235de16:visited , .ub95c893e1ed5b3ede3d8d8539235de16:active { border:0!important; } .ub95c893e1ed5b3ede3d8d8539235de16 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ub95c893e1ed5b3ede3d8d8539235de16 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ub95c893e1ed5b3ede3d8d8539235de16:active , .ub95c893e1ed5b3ede3d8d8539235de16:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ub95c893e1ed5b3ede3d8d8539235de16 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ub95c893e1ed5b3ede3d8d8539235de16 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ub95c893e1ed5b3ede3d8d8539235de16 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ub95c893e1ed5b3ede3d8d8539235de16 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ub95c893e1ed5b3ede3d8d8539235de16:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ub95c893e1ed5b3ede3d8d8539235de16 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ub95c893e1ed5b3ede3d8d8539235de16 .ub95c893e1ed5b3ede3d8d8539235de16-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ub95c893e1ed5b3ede3d8d8539235de16:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: King Lear Essay SummarySo, both the director and the exterminator thought that they could change the world by their careers. One thought that it would be a genius idea to have a fake elephant on display instead of the real one. And the other one was supposed to get rid of bugs to better ones comfort but instead misunderstood and went out killing many people with the title critic. By the actions of the directors selfishness, he had ruined his reputation and neglected the studies of the children. Again by misunderstanding of the exterminator, not only had he frustrated Goshawk but had killed many innocent lives. Little things that are taken for granted need to be carefully t hought about before actually acting, that way, things dont end up in a huge mess!